AMD FireStream 9270 vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+599%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2023
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG2-256
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
