Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +1590%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy