Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +2000%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jul 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
1440
Shading Units
32
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G96
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy