AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+663%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1440
Shading Units
96
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
84W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
G92
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
