AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+869%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GT
0.208 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1440
Shading Units
64
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
G94
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
