Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +385%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1440
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200B
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy