Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 +106%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GK110
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy