AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
18016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+3953%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
19456
72
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
153 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
