Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +1484%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
3072
72
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 32
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy