AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT
+157%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2019
FireStream
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1408
72
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
