AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+1073%
23.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
5120
72
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
335W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX
(215-121000289)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
