AMD FireStream 9370 vs ATI FirePro V3700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
1560 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+4025%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2008
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV620
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
