AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+7442%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1600
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT216
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
