AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 440 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+748%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 440
0.311 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1600
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GF108
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
