AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+280%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640
0.693 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GK107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GK107-300-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
