Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +8091%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy