NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
+2094%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
