NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD Radeon PRO W9070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 4GB VRAM Radeon PRO W9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon PRO W9070 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W9070
+14014%
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
