Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 107W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT +14682%
5.765 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
107W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 24
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT (215-135000006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy