Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe +4287%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 300M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Baffin
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy