NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+5189%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 300M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
