NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 128SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 128SP
+518%
0.563 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2022
GeForce 300M
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
2
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1126 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
563.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Raphael
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
264 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
