Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 6250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (7W vs 23W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition +106%
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250 IGP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 300M
Generation
Palm
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
80
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.104 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.208 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.16 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

23W
TDP
7W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

C89
GPU Name
Loveland
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.45 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
75 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy