Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +2115%
2.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 400M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
815 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Vega 12
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
Unknown
79 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy