Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 6200 vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA GeForce 6200 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 6200 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 8.800GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2004
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 6 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
275 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.800GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

600.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Curie
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy