NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI vs AMD FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 6 PCI
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
560.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1.120 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV44
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Curie
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
