Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon E2400

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock941MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M +1406%
0.723 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 800M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
941 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
384
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy