Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +54445%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy