Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +159650%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 32
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy