Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +13466%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
14
8
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy