Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +1325%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Apr 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
195W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GK104
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy