NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
+1165%
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1792
28
TMUs
112
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Tahiti
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
