NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1280GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
+288%
1.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2011
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
7
112
Shading Units
336
28
TMUs
56
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF114
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
