NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+785%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
28
TMUs
48
20
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
DG1
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
Unknown
484 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
