NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs AMD FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
+3355%
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Opal
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
