NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1594MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 13W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
+5463%
1.224 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1531 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
3
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GP108
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
