NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+16822%
3.723 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 9M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Amethyst
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
