Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +1613%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 9
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy