Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +2082%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Tahiti
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy