Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +243%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
27
48
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GT200B
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy