NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GTX and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 44.80GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GTX
0.278 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+1152%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 9
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
44.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.280 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
27.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
278.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
