NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1379MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 16.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
+113%
1.059 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2018
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1152 MHz
Base Clock
-
1379 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
33.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
16.55 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1059 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
33.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
RV670
GP108-310-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
