NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
+5873%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 100
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.02GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
