NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 130M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130M
0.096 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+33952%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
76
32
Shading Units
9728
16
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
AD103
N10P-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
