Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Intel Arc A750

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +8169%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 100
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy