Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
16832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +29746%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 100
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
132
64
Shading Units
16896
32
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
GB100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
208 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy