NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+43678%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 100
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
142
64
Shading Units
18176
32
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
