Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 220
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +2966%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
20
48
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

58W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy