Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +160%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
12
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Turks
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy