Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +1564%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy